Interest rates – gradual lift likely
Long-term bond yields continued to creep gradually higher in December as the prospect of further significant near-term monetary stimulus eased in line with an improving global economic outlook. U.S. 10-year government bond yields ended the month at 0.92%, and Australian 10-year rates at 0.97% – implying a small positive spread for local rates of 0.05%. This compared with a daily low for U.S. 10-year yields of 0.5% on August 4, and 0.62% for local yields on 9 March. U.S. rates have lifted modestly more than local rates in recent months, with the bond spread contracting from a month-end peak of 0.29% at end-July.
Based on current cash rates and 12-month forward policy expectations in Australia and the U.S. (essentially no expected change in rates), my Australian 10-year model suggests fair-value around the current rate of 1%, i.e. bonds are fairly priced given current market expectations. Accordingly, if we end 2021 with no policy change and the market essentially expecting no policy change over 2022 either, bonds yields need not rise much further from where they currently are.
My base case expectation remains for a fairly benign interest rate outlook this year, with continued broad policy alignment between Australia and the U.S. Specifically, I expect no policy change in either Australia or the U.S. this year, though by year-end I expect the market will be pricing one 0.25% tightening in both countries for 2022 – such that local and U.S. 10-year bonds end the year around 1.25%. Of course, there are both upside and downside risks to this outlook – but the main message is that modelling suggests bond yields are at present not that unusually low given current monetary settings, and so should stay fairly low if monetary setting don’t change all that much.
Australian dollar – firm for now but should ease
The Australian dollar continued to power higher over December, ending the year at US76.9c, compared with a recent end-month low of US61.3c at end-March. Although the RBA has tried valiantly to hold down the $A through further local monetary easing, the reduction in Australian-US short-term interest rate differentials has only been modest whilst important drivers – such as broad based weakness in the $US and surging iron-ore prices have provided offsets.
Indeed, based on historic relationships since 2005 between the $A, interest rate differentials, the $US and iron-ore prices, my valuation model suggested the $A could have gone as high as US83c! This alone suggests the $A could push even higher in the short-run, even if underlying fundamentals don’t change all that much (although I note iron-price prices in the early days of the new year have dropped back to US$133/tonne, placing fair-value at US81c).
Where to for the $A? Interest rates are likely to remain a neutral influence, given broad monetary alignment between Australia and the U.S. Iron-ore prices, however, should ease over the coming year as China eases back on stimulus and Brazilian supply continues to gradually recover. Indeed, last month’s mid-year Federal Government budget update projected a fall in iron-ore prices to US$55/tonne by September (compared with the year-end level of US$155!) – which would be consistent with a fair value for the $A (assuming all else constant) of around US75c.
That leaves the outlook for the $US. Weakness over the past year at first reflected an unwinding of the initial COVID-related flight to $US safety, but the $US has fallen to well below pre-COVID levels in more recent months. This added weakness appears to reflect a view that non-U.S. ‘value’ parts of the global equity market may continue to outperform with global recovery, and also risks related to the U.S. economy due to both election uncertainty and its ongoing COVID problem.
My expectation, however, is that the $US should stabilise in coming months and regain some strength as America recovers from the COVID shock and U.S. dominant technology/growth stocks reassert their relative strength. On the view that the $US strengthens by 5% by end-2021 and iron-ore prices fall to US$75/tonne, my year-end $A fair-value estimate would be around US74c.
Equity prices – earnings-driven recovery
After a mid-year pause, the recovery in Australian equities from the February/March slump resumed over the final months of 2021. The S&P/ASX 200 Index returned a further 1.2% in December after a strong 10.2% return in November. All up, the market returned 1.4% last year, with a 31.9% rebound from the monthly end-March low just offsetting the 23.1% slump over the first three months. The S&P/ASX 200 price index, however, did drop 1.5% over the year, with a 3% dividend return (which itself was down on historic returns of around 4 to 5%) keeping the total return in positive territory.
As seen in the chart below, one heartening aspect of recent share market performance is that it has reflected a rebound in earnings (or more specifically earnings expectations) rather than further escalation in already lofty price-to-earnings valuations. One a month-end basis, the price-to-forward earnings ratio peaked at 21.8 at end-August, though ended the year at 20.4. With the 10-year government bond yield around 1%, that implies an equity earnings-yield (inverse of the PE ratio) to bond-yield gap of around 4%, which remains broadly in line with average levels over the past decade or so.
Where to for equities? Assuming a modest lift in bond yields, PE valuations could be a modest drag on returns – indeed, if 10-year bond yields hit 1.25% by year-end and the equity-bond yield gap holds at around 4%, the PE ratio would decline to around 19 – implying a 5% decline. Meanwhile, current earnings expectations imply 14% growth in forward earnings over the coming year, which if realised could still produce a net price return of around 5 to 10%, or total return of 9 to 14% including a modestly improved dividend return of around 4%.
All this is consistent with a base case year-end S&P/ASX 200 target of around 7,000.
Equity trends – U.S./growth vs non-U.S./value?
As evident in the table below, along with the maturing of the global equity rebound from the March lows of last year, long-unloved value and non-U.S. regions have attempted to outmuscle U.S./growth/technology themes in recent months. Over the last three months of 2020, Japan and emerging markets performed best among regions, financials and energy shone among global sectors, with small caps and value faring best among factors. Japan and EM continued to do well in December, though technology performed strongly among sectors while value slipped back among factors. On a currency-hedged basis, relative Australian performance has been mixed, though much stronger than unhedged global equities due to strength in the $A.
Tables ordered by 6/12 month return performance for each region, sector and factor respectively – on a local currency basis. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. You cannot invest directly in an index.
Whether this attempted rotation away from the winning U.S./tech/growth themes of recent years persists remains to be seen. A lift in oil prices and bond yields as the global economy recovers should favour value sectors such as energy and financials respectively. But technology also retains strong structural tailwinds and still-reasonable overall valuations given promised solid earnings growth.
Overall, I remain dubious whether we’re really seeing a sustained rotation, or merely an unwind of the premium growth sectors attracted in the early dark days of the COVID sell-off.
As seen in the table below, these trends are reflected in the performance of BetaShares’ thematic global and Australian equity ETFs.
Tables ordered by 6/12 month return performance for each region, sector and factor respectively. Past performance is not indicative of future performance of any index or fund. You cannot invest directly in an index. Index performance doesn’t take into account any fund fees and costs.
Within Australian equities, technology (ATEC) and small caps (SMLL) bounced back solidly last month after missing November’s market gains, while resources (QRE) had another strong month, reflecting continued strength in iron-ore prices. These remain the top three relative performers.
Among the global currency-hedged funds***, the tech heavy NASDAQ-100 (HNDQ) and gold miners sector (MNRS) bounced back last month, the latter helped by a rebound in gold prices (which in turn likely reflected further $US weakness). Quality’s (HQLT) relative performance has levelled out in recent months, though along with food producers (FOOD) and HNDQ it remains among the top three relative performers. Energy producers (FUEL) and banks (BNKS) enjoyed a strong last quarter, which so far, however, has only partly made up for quite weak relative performance earlier in the year.
Among the global currency-unhedged funds, tech-related ASIA and HACK produced the strongest returns last month, which along with another tech-related exposure (RBTZ), remain the top three relative performers. Also noteworthy is that India (IIND) has produced solid returns in recent months and is also displaying a positive relative performance trend along with our actively managed emerging markets exposure (EMMG).
*Trend: Outright trend is up if the relevant NAV return index is above its 12-month moving average and the slope of the moving average is positive, and down if the index is below this moving average and the slope of the moving average is negative. No trend is displayed in all other cases. Relative trend is based on the ratio of the relevant return index to its broader Australian or global benchmark index.
**The ranking of performance is based on an equally-weighted average of 6 & 12 month return performance.
***Where both currency-hedged and unhedged global equity funds are available, the analysis focuses only on the currency-hedged fund performance.