Russia/Ukraine: Rising geopolitical risks and portfolio implications | BetaShares

Russia/Ukraine: Rising geopolitical risks and portfolio implications

BY David Bassanese | 1 March 2022

Reading time: 5 minutes

Given the enormity of Russia’s decision to invade Ukraine, this note provides a short update on the potential market implications.

Keeping in mind that the situation remains very fluid and uncertain, as at the time of writing – Tuesday morning, 1 March, Sydney time – these are my early tentative assessments.

The escalation of the situation in Ukraine has already caused an increase in the equity risk premium and, in turn, a market drawdown. More volatility seems likely in the days and weeks ahead, especially given the severity of the new sanctions imposed on Russia over the weekend.

These include restrictions on Russian access to the SWIFT system of international payment messaging, which will hamper Russia’s ability to earn export receipts and pay for imports. Also pivotal was the decision of several countries, including Germany and the U.S., to provide military equipment to Ukraine.

These new sanctions pose the risk of disruption to Russia’s significant exports of gas, oil and agricultural commodities, which would only exacerbate current upward pressure on global inflation. There is also the growing risk of spill over from likely extreme movements in Russian financial markets, and a potential Russian sovereign debt default.

Nearer-term investment implications

The potential sectors of interest in this sea of near-term uncertainty remain energy and gold exposures, though we would note the stock specific risks and need for diversification when investing in global equities in the current environment, some of which may have exposure to Russian assets.

  • The escalation of tension in the Ukraine has been accompanied by rising energy prices, and with the risk of Russian energy sanctions persisting, this could drive up oil and gas prices further. Exposure to the price of crude oil futures and the energy sector is possible through the BetaShares Crude Oil ETF (ASX Code: OOO) and the BetaShares Global Energy Companies ETF (ASX Code: FUEL) respectively.
  • Given that Russia and Ukraine account for one quarter of global grain exports, any war-induced disruptions to supply could also drive up already high world food prices – which in turn could boost profits for other producers. Exposure to the world’s top food producers is possible through the BetaShares Global Agriculture Companies ETF – Currency Hedged (ASX Code: FOOD).
  • High inflation and war uncertainty has also seen gold prices lift of late, as the precious metal is often viewed as a ‘safe haven’ asset in times of volatility. Exposure to gold is possible through the BetaShares Gold Bullion ETF (ASX Code: QAU).
  • For those who fear a deeper equity market correction, and who may wish to hedge their equity positions against such an eventuality, other options are available through a range of short funds, such as BEAR, BBOZ and BBUS. These funds are designed to generate returns that are negatively correlated to the returns of either the Australian or the U.S. sharemarket.
  • Another potential flight to ’save haven’ exposure is the U.S. dollar, which could rise if there is a global liquidity squeeze. Exposure to the U.S. dollar (versus the Australian dollar) is possible through the BetaShares U.S. Dollar ETF (ASX Code: USD) and the BetaShares Strong U.S. Dollar Fund (hedge fund) (ASX Code: YANK).

Longer-term outlook

Beyond further likely volatility over the nearer-term, our overall assessment is that the Russian-Ukraine crisis shouldn’t significantly disrupt the longer-term global economic and financial market outlook.

This is due to a number of factors including:

  • the relatively small size of the Russian and Ukrainian economy, comprising 2% and 0.1% of global GDP respectively. Russia’s economy is roughly the size of Canada’s;
  • the fact that global corporate earnings growth to date remains solid, and the global economy is continuing to recover from COVID restrictions, thanks to widespread take-up of vaccines and a less severe COVID variant;
  • based upon past confrontations, it’s the uncertainty leading up to conflict that has tended to do most damage to markets. Once the event itself happened, the earlier ‘event risk’ priced into markets has tended to dissipate somewhat as the uncertainty receded.

Bigger picture, I do not see the Russia-Ukraine conflict as ultimately overriding the main current global market concern: high inflation and tight labour markets in countries such as the United States, which requires its central bank to progressively raise interest rates this year from what are still near-zero levels. Equity valuations are coming under downward pressure as interest rates rise, but so far at least, earnings growth is holding up and should provide an offset.

A large element of these interest rate increases, moreover, is already priced into the market and further upside in long-term bond yields – which particularly affect the growth/technology sectors – should be limited. My base case is that U.S. 10-year bond yields will reach 2.25% in H1 2022, from recent highs of around 2% – but they have already lifted from around 0.5% since mid/late 2020.

Barring a U.S. recession, which still seems unlikely for at least the next year, a market correction of around 10-20% over coming months remains my base case, but not a lot more. In the U.S., the S&P 500 has already fallen 10%, though technology exposures – which are more sensitive to interest rates – have fallen somewhat more.


Image attribution: sharafmaksumov –

Investing involves risk. The value of an investment and income distributions can go down as well as up. BetaShares Funds should only be considered as a component of a diversified portfolio. For more information on risks and other features of each BetaShares Fund, please see the Target Market Determination (TMD) and Product Disclosure Statement, available at outcomes are impossible to predict. This article includes opinions and projections (“forward looking statements”) which are, by their very nature, subject to various risks and uncertainties. Actual events or results may differ materially, positively or negatively, from those reflected or contemplated in such statements. Forward looking statements are based on certain assumptions which may not be correct.The price of oil futures contracts is not the same as the “spot price” of oil. As such, OOO does not aim to, and should not be expected to, provide the same return as the performance of this spot price. The performance of an ETF that is linked to oil futures may be materially different to the performance of the spot price of oil itself. This is because the process of “rolling” from one futures contract to the next to maintain investment exposure can result in either a cost or benefit to the fund, affecting returns.The short funds’ strategies of seeking returns that are negatively correlated to market returns is the opposite of most managed funds. Also, gearing magnifies gains and losses and may not be a suitable strategy for all investors. Investors in geared strategies should be willing to accept higher levels of investment volatility and potentially large moves (both up and down) in the value of their investment. Geared investments involve significantly higher risk than non-geared investments. Investors should seek professional financial advice before investing and monitor their investment actively. The short funds are actively managed and do not track a published benchmark.

Leave a Reply