If the idea of making money while sleeping sounds appealing, then passive investing may be a great approach to consider.
It’s commonly achieved by purchasing low-cost products, such as index funds and letting them compound returns over time.
Extolled by billionaire investor Warren Buffett, passive investing has increased in popularity globally, and Australia has caught on to the trend.
In fact, investors across all generations, including millennials, retirees, and self-managed superannuation funds, have poured over A$135 billion into exchange traded products trading on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX), while that figure is A$14 trillion for ETFs globally.
Active vs passive: what’s the difference?
In order to understand why passive investing has become so popular, it’s important to compare and contrast the strategy to active investing.
In passive investing, the primary objective is to achieve the same return as the index or indices being tracked (before fees and expenses).
For example, if an index representing Australia’s 200 biggest companies rises by 10% in a year, the ETF or passive fund that seeks to track that index would generally be expected to return the around the same amount (before fees and expenses).
Because passive investing by its nature does not involve timing markets or picking stocks, the strategy has a number of compelling benefits.
- Competitive fees – Passive funds and ETFs generally have lower fees than active strategies, which typically try to beat the market or a particular benchmark.
- Increased transparency – Passive funds publish exactly what they own on a daily basis and generally won’t hold investments outside the index being tracked. Most active funds, on the other hand, tend not to provide the same transparency.
- No prospect of outperformance – As the goal of passive investing is to achieve market returns, a passive investor will not beat the index.
- Certain strategies cannot be accessed – While passive funds offer plenty of choice and access to different asset classes, they generally can’t employ some of the sophisticated techniques active funds may have at their disposal, such as short-selling specific companies.
In contrast to a passive strategy, active investing involves a hands-on approach where an investor or professional fund manager aims to beat a benchmark or index by employing a wide variety of methods.
Some active managers analyse various aspects of companies, and may perform site-visits and meet management teams, to form a view on which stocks will outperform. Others use proprietary trading algorithms to buy and sell stocks based on different factors.
- Flexibility – Generally, unlike in passive investing, active investors don’t have to track the performance of a particular index and hold the securities in that index. They seek to pick perceived outperformers and avoid investing in potential duds.
- Ability to apply more strategies – Active managers generally have broader scope to use short-selling, derivatives, and other strategies or financial instruments to seek to protect against losses or generate additional returns.
- Higher costs – Whether you do it yourself or pay a professional, active investing is typically more expensive. Active investors tend to buy and sell more, and active funds generally charge higher fees than index funds or ETFs (more on this below).
- No guarantee of outperformance – While active investing is more expensive, there is no guarantee of outperformance either. An active manager could significantly underperform the relevant benchmark or index, and investors will typically pay relatively higher fees.
Active vs passive investing performance: The Warren Buffett view
The debate between active and passive investing is an age-old conundrum: Should investors choose (the potential for) higher returns or lower fees?
Warren Buffett, the chairman and CEO of Berkshire Hathaway, has stated his belief that most investors are better off sticking to index funds as they don’t have the time or skills to manage their own portfolio, and the fact that higher fees don’t necessarily translate to superior returns.
In fact, Buffett test-drove this theory by making a US$1 million bet in 2007 that a passively-managed S&P 500 index fund would outperform five high profile active funds run by highly-paid Wall Street professionals over the next decade.
“A virtually cost-free investment in an unmanaged S&P 500 index fund – would, over time, deliver better results than those achieved by most investment professionals, however well-regarded and incentivized those ‘helpers’ may be,” Buffett wrote in his 2017 Shareholder Letter where he shared the results of that bet.
Over the 10 years to 2017:
- The S&P 500 delivered 125.8% cumulative growth
- The worst of five active funds delivered a paltry 2.8%, while the best returned 87.7% over the same period.
Of course, it’s important to remember that past performance isn’t indicative of future performance.
Table: The Buffett Bet – S&P 500 versus five select active funds
Source: Berkshire Hathaway 2017 Shareholder Letter. Provided for illustrative examples only. Not a recommendation to investor or adopt any investment strategy. Past performance is not indicative of future performance.
Passive outperforms in Australia
The data also supports Buffett’s views about passive investing in an Australian context.
Standard & Poor’s, the company famous for creating the namesake “S&P” indices, conducts regular studies on the performance of active and passive managers over time.
In its SPIVA Australia 2021 Scorecard, the company found over a 10-year period:
- About four out of five active funds in Australian equities, global equities, Australian Real Estate Investment Trusts and bonds underperformed the respective comparison indices
- Nearly all global equity funds underperformed the comparison index
- Only 44% of mid- and small-cap funds beat the comparison index
Table: Active funds vs the comparison index across core asset class categories
Source: SPIVA Australia 2021 Scorecard by Standard & Poor’s
Consider the impact of fees
Despite data highlighting that majority of active funds have underperformed, investors have tended to pay more to hold them.
ASX data indicates average fees are:
- 1.33% p.a. for listed investment companies (LIC) and listed investment trusts (LIT), which are popular active investment structures listed on the ASX
- 1.06% p.a. for exchange-quoted managed funds (EQMF), which are essentially actively-managed funds quoted on the ASX
- 0.26% for passive ETFs
Table: Average management fees across passive and active products
Source: ASX Data, Betashares – 30 June 2022
Ongoing fees matter because they can reduce the value of an investor’s portfolio and have a major impact on how much they earn, particularly in the case of any underperforming active funds.
The following chart shows the impact of various fee levels on an investment portfolio with a 4% annual return over 20 years.
Table: Portfolio Value From Investing $100,000 Over 20 Years
Source: Investor.gov. Hypothetical example provided for illustrative purposes only.
ASX ETFs – Average annual management fees
Passive ETFs: 0.44%
Active ETFs: 0.96%
ASX ETFs – Weighted average annual management fees
Passive ETFs: 0.28%
Active ETFs: 1.06%
Useful tip: Use the Australian Government’s managed funds fee calculator to help you understand the impact of fund fees as you compare different products for your portfolio.
Consider active where it makes sense
While costs are important considerations for all investors, the reality is investors should carefully consider their personal circumstances and which strategies are best aligned to them.
In an active versus passive context, one possible approach to consider is a core/satellite strategy where “core” index funds and ETFs form the bulk of a portfolio to keep costs low. Meanwhile, “satellite” active strategies are used selectively to enhance a portfolio’s overall returns, yield, or capital preservation qualities.
How to start passive investing with ETFs?
Building a portfolio with passive investments can be a great strategy for long-term wealth creation. Before getting started, it is critical for investors think about what they need from their portfolio before deciding where to invest.
Below are useful considerations if you’re thinking about using ETFs to begin your passive investing journey:
What are you investing for? Different goals can determine how much money you can afford to put at risk in volatile growth assets versus defensive assets.
The fact of life is that markets rise and fall. The key issue is how much of a fall can you tolerate – 10%? 20%? For example, even if you’re young, you may not necessarily be comfortable with an all-growth portfolio.
Diversification is key, and asset allocation is the blueprint of how your portfolio is invested based on your goals and risk tolerance. It involves thinking about the split between the growth and defensive “buckets”, and then how the portfolio is further divided between Australian equities, international stocks, bonds and so on.
Consider also having minimum and maximum percentage weightings or limits to any one asset class to further manage risk.
How much and how regularly to invest depends on what you can afford to invest versus what’s needed for day-to-day living expenses. Some investors put in large amounts of money all at once, while others choose to invest monthly, quarterly, or annually.
Not all ETFs are the same. Use our ETF checklist to help you ask the right questions as you compare and choose between different products.
Rebalancing is the process of buying and selling investments to bring your asset allocation to the limits you originally set to manage portfolio risk. For example, investors may consider rebalancing quarterly, semi-annually or annually.
You may also wish to consider seeking the services of a financial adviser (as well as seeking independent tax advice) to help you plan your investing journey and structure a portfolio based on your goals.
Start your journey by comparing Betashares ETFs
Now that you have a better understanding of passive investing, take a peek at our broad selection of ETFs across major asset classes and sectors in the table below. When you’re ready to invest, you’ll need to create a brokerage account (if you don’t already have one). Prior to making a purchase, check out the nine things to know before investing in ETFs.
Betashares offers a wide selection of international share ETFs that provide access to a range of offshore markets including the U.S., Europe, and Asia.
Australian share ETFs give you exposure to companies listed on the local sharemarket.
Betashares’ ethical ETFs provide exposure to a portfolio of equities or bonds that are subject to strict ESG screens.
The Betashares Diversified ETFs are cost-effective, all-in-one portfolio solutions for investors either looking for high growth, or whose priority is ethical investing.
Betashares’ fixed income ETFs allow you to gain exposure to a number of different types of bonds or other fixed income securities.
An equity income fund may be suitable for an investor looking for relatively high yields and a regular income stream from a portfolio of shares.
Investing involves risk. The value of an investment and income distributions can go down as well as up. Before making an investment decision you should consider the relevant Product Disclosure Statement and the Target Market Determination (available at www.betashares.com.au) and your particular circumstances, including your tolerance for risk, and obtain financial advice. An investment in any Betashares Fund should only be considered as a component of a broader portfolio.
Video and Content Executive
Ben brings a unique blend of financial acumen and creative storytelling to his role. With a solid background as a portfolio analyst, Ben possesses a deep understanding of the financial markets, investment strategies, and how ETFs work.Read more from Benjamin.