Are AI financing concerns enough to derail the equity market? | Betashares
About
Loading
This content is for financial adviser use only.
By clicking on 'Financial professional', you certify that you are an Australian financial services licensee or authorised representative, and are authorised to provide personal advice to retail clients in relation to managed investment schemes.
Home
keyboard_arrow_down
chevron_right
Insights
keyboard_arrow_down
chevron_right
Are AI financing concerns enough to derail the equity market?
keyboard_arrow_down

Are AI financing concerns enough to derail the equity market?

7 min read • 21 Oct 2026

This information is for the use of financial advisers. It must not be distributed to retail clients.

Key points

01
Financing concerns rattles tech: neocloud operators are bearing the brunt of tighter funding conditions, with credit markets increasingly separating strong balance sheets from stretched ones.
02
Earnings still doing the heavy lifting: S&P 500 earnings are expected to grow 30.7% for Q3, led by semiconductors and underpinned by AI capex that is still largely funded from hyperscaler cash flows.
03
Breadth is improving, but leadership remains in tech: the other 493 are expected to outgrow the Magnificent 7 in Q4 for the first time since 2022, although tech names outside of this cohort remain key contributors.
04
Diversifying beyond tech: the structural case for tech remains intact, but equal weight and ex-US exposures can complement core tech holdings.

Over the last week, jitters around the sustainability of AI capex and how it is being funded drove a reversal in tech-related companies and markets.

Neocloud operator CoreWeave fell nearly 30% in a single session as yields on its 2031 bonds surged to more than 15% while data centre operator Firmus withdrew what was set to be one of Australia’s largest share market floats. AI-linked equity markets such as the Nasdaq 100, Japan’s Nikkei 225 and South Korea’s KOSPI also felt the pain with the latter one of the worst performing regions down 16.4%1 for the week.

Financing constraints are emerging as a real bottleneck to the development of AI given the increasing reliance on debt and equity issuance to fund massive data centre builds. More complex financing arrangements such as circular vendor-customer relationships and off-balance sheet commitments are increasingly being used, which raises the risk of a correction should interest rate volatility and levels increase from here.

While financing markets are tightening, a higher cost of capital may not necessarily be a bad thing for long term returns with less indebted companies more insulated than those relying on cheap funding and rising valuations.

Indeed, the credit market is highlighting this difference with Oracle’s credit default swaps much wider than the broader investment grade technology sector. Spreads across other US large cap tech issuers show a similar divergence.

Source: Bloomberg, Betashares. Senior USD fixed-rate bond yields interpolated to 10 years remaining, less the 10-year US Treasury yield; a cash-bond spread proxy, not OAS, so the IG all-sector OAS row is an indicative reference. SpaceX is shown from its June 2026 debut.

In our view, AI financing concerns in themselves are unlikely to derail the equity market while earnings continue to deliver but will likely create pockets of volatility in leveraged exposures like neocloud operators.

Corporate earnings look strong but what’s happening underneath the surface?

Ultimately, the health of corporate earnings is a key driver of long term equity market returns.

Third quarter earnings for the S&P 500 are expected to grow 30.7%, in large part supported by the semiconductor industry within IT. Much of this stems from AI capex spending with a large share of that spending still being funded from the operating cash flows of the largest hyperscalers, Oracle aside.

The only other sector growing earnings faster than IT is Energy due to higher year over year oil prices but even excluding this sector, the S&P 500 is still growing earnings at 26.2%.

Sector Earnings $B – 26Q3 Earnings $B – 25Q3 Growth $B – 26Q3 Growth % – 26Q3
Consumer Discretionary 56.2 54.3 1.9 3.5%
Consumer Staples 33.8 32.6 1.2 3.7%
Energy 58.6 25.7 32.9 128.3%
Financials 121.3 114.9 6.4 5.5%
Health Care 72.3 71.5 0.9 1.2%
Industrials 51.2 43.4 7.8 18.1%
Materials 15.7 11.9 3.8 31.5%
Real Estate 14.7 14.2 0.6 3.9%
Information Technology 256.6 154.1 102.5 66.5%
Communication Services 70.5 48.3 22.2 46.1%
Utilities 23.0 21.5 1.4 6.7%
S&P 500 773.9 592.3 181.6 30.7%
S&P 500 ex-Energy 715.3 566.6 148.7 26.2%

Source: LSEG I/B/E/S. As at October 16, 2026.

Earnings breadth remains narrow due to the strength of tech but there are signs of broadening with analysts predicting the Magnificent 7 companies will report lower earnings growth than the other 493 S&P 500 companies (23.6% vs. 30.6%) for the next quarter (Q4) which would mark the first time since Q4 20222.

Financing concerns are a potential contributor with names like Nvidia indirectly exposed through its equity stakes in CoreWeave and Nebius, although these are small relative to its market capitalisation.

Tighter financing could also pressure cloud revenue growth at hyperscalers such as Oracle and Microsoft, given a meaningful share of their contracted backlogs is concentrated in AI labs (namely OpenAI).

Despite these risks, analysts expect leadership to remain with technology, with IT earnings forecast to grow 41.8% in calendar year 2027. It’s worth noting that the other 493 companies include AI beneficiaries such as Broadcom, Micron and AMD so some of this broadening reflects AI spending flowing through the supply chain. Beyond tech, Health Care (23.0%) and Industrials (16.3%) are expected to grow in line with or ahead of the index.

Source: FactSet. As at October 16, 2026.

What are we looking out for?

Last week’s price declines reflect real financing risks but may create opportunities in businesses with resilient earnings prospects. In our view, the structural case for technology remains intact and makes it difficult to ignore the earnings strength of diversified, core exposure like the NDQ Nasdaq 100 ETF.

However, the risk-reward has shifted with financing conditions having the potential to slow capex growth and moderate the pace of earnings upgrades. Broadening exposures such as the QUS S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF or EXUS Global Shares Ex US ETF can complement a broad US market cap weighted exposure like NDQ as earnings leadership widens.

Overnight, we will be watching Meta earnings and guidance on their 2027 capex and whether spending moderates relative to revenue growth, alongside free cash flow and its funding mix. Beyond earnings, we continue to monitor movements in credit spreads across AI-exposed issuers and the Federal Reserve’s 27–28 October meeting which will shape the rates backdrop for the remainder of the quarter.

There are risks associated with an investment in NDQ, QUS and EXUS, including market risk (the value of investments can fall as well as rise), currency risk (changes in exchange rates can affect returns from overseas investments) and, for NDQ, sector concentration risk (a focus on technology companies can make returns more volatile than a broadly diversified fund). Investment value can go up and down. An investment in each Fund should only be considered as a part of a broader portfolio, taking into account your particular circumstances, including your tolerance for risk. For more information on risks and other features of each Fund, please see the Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination, both available on this website.

The article is general information only and does not take into account any person’s financial objectives, situation or needs. Investors should consider the appropriateness of the information taking into account such factors and seek financial advice. This article is provided for information purposes only and is not a recommendation to make any investment or adopt any investment strategy. Investments in Betashares Funds are subject to investment risk and investors may not get back the full amount originally invested. Future outcomes are inherently uncertain. Actual outcomes may differ materially from those contemplated in any opinions, estimates or other forward-looking statements given in this article.

Past performance is not indicative of future performance.

1. Source: Bloomberg. Local currency terms. As at 16 October 2026. ↑

2. Source: FactSet. As at October 16, 2026. ↑

Loading
Feedback
close

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Please rate your experience with our website:*
Please let us know of any recommendations, difficulties or comments you have regarding our website

Feedback